One Heckuva Terrific Book Trailer!

For Jeri Westerson's Crispin Guest Medieval Noirs.



Congrats, Jeri.. and the books are even better!

Plot Bunnies

I learned a new word today that only a novelist could really appreciate. Well, maybe a short story writer, too.

plotbunnies

Plotbunnies. Oh how I know about those! One of the most puzzling, most incomprehensible questions I have ever been asked as a writer is "But how do you come up with ideas to write about?"

How do I not come up with ideas?

Plot ideas are like harpies or mosquitoes or pesky musical earworms or other plaguing things. Plotbunnies can be very dangerous, even lethal. You are going along merrily with the execution of some terrific story idea and BAM! another one. A more intriguing one. One you just can't wait to pursue.

Sweep them under the bed as you will.. it's no use.

Wait! I just remembered! I can drag out a plotbunny for NaNoWriMo!

OK, OK, OK.... phew.

What Was It like to Live in the Early Middle Ages?

You know what it is like to go camping. How would you like to camp from the moment you are born to the moment you die?

1. You spend a lot of time outdoors because indoors there was very little light even at the best of times.

2. You are only warm and dry when the weather outside is warm and dry.

3. If something hurts, it keeps hurting until it heals. The efficacy of herbal medicine that you read of in historical novels is highly optimistic.

4. You break a tooth on the bits of millstone in the bread you eat.

5. You do not change your clothes very often at all.

6. You never go more than several miles from where you were born.

7. You do not hear about important events for weeks, months or even years.

8. If you do travel, you are out in the weather whether walking or on horse, If it rains you get soaked. The roads are narrow and muddy much of the time.

9. If your leave your loved ones or they leave you to live even a matter of leagues away, you hear very little if anything from or about them ever.

10. The food you eat is based on what is in season at the time or what could be preserved or stored. There is little variety.

11. You breathe in smoke from your fire day and night.

12. You probably have to deal with lice and fleas.

13. If you become pregnant you know you have a strong chance of dying in childbirth.

14. Just about everything you have you or someone in your family made by hand.

15. You never have any privacy.

The point of this list is not to disturb anyone's illusions, but simply to acknowledge differences that are easy to forget. It is likewise easy to forget that these conditions still exist in the world.

Feel free to add to this list.

Why & How I Teach with Historical Fiction

Borrowed shamelessly from Scholastic.

By Tarry Lindquist

Here's the story on historical fiction in my classroom: It illuminates time periods, helps me integrate the curriculum, and enriches social studies. Just take Amy's word for it. At the end of our westward-expansion unit, while modeling her journal entry after a fictional account we'd read, this fifth grader wrote: "Dear Diary, July 30, 1852: This journey has been heart-wrenching, thirst-quenching, and most of all, an adventure I will never forget." Blending stories into a study of history turns the past into a dynamic place.

Of course, historical fiction doesn't stand alone in my instructional program; even the best literature cannot address skills and processes unique to social studies that kids must learn. I have students balance fiction with fact, validate historical hypotheses with research. Historical fiction is the spice.

To help you build good fiction into your social studies program, below you'll find:

• Seven Reasons I Teach with Historical Fiction
• Fifteen Fabulous New Historical Fiction Books
• Is Pocahontas Real? Discovering Where History Stops and the Story Starts
• Seven Reasons I Teach With Historical Fiction: It piques kids' curiosity.

Read more.

I can certainly attest to the efficacy of historical fiction in engaging a child's imagination about history, people, geography, sociology, and more. In about 1957 I started watching the British television series, The Adventures of Robin Hood, sstarring Richard Greene and Alan Wheatly. Something in it either spoke to an inner reality for me or implanted that reality so permanently that I have never been the same. I knew those people, that time, these cultural metaphors. Or perhaps they took me over and drew me out of my own time and place to live in theirs.

I am coming full circle now that I am crowding sixty. With my relatively recent re-immersion in writing historical fiction that comfortable old world is becoming a reality to me again. This time around it is the more accurate Middle Ages that draws me. That's not really new, since my thirst for the world of characters like Robin Hood developed in my teens when my friend Laura and I started writing about the characters who people my novel, An Involuntary King. It was my desire to place that story in a time not already taken with historical facts that would refute my fiction that led me to set it before Charlemagne when I thought no one knew anything about what was going on in the world. Now I am thirsting for further facts, to engage my imagination in real history about an era, Anglo Saxon England, that I stumbled into decades ago.

Perhaps this is why I am not fond of unicorns, dragons, and wizards and not even of the goddess religion remake of the Middle Ages. I did not fall in love with a fantasy way back in 1957 but rather a real if fictionalized world that seemed so right to me. I am smart enough now to know the truth is grittier, but I am also adult enough and sensible enough not to be repulsed. Maybe Robin didn't really take showers in a waterfall, but so what? The time doesn't so much appeal to me as it is familiar to me. Warts and all.

I know a woman who though otherwise intelligent decries historical fiction as lying to unsuspecting readers about the past and its people. I could not disagree more. The fact is we don't really know every detail about their lives and their thoughts. By speculating, each historical novelist offers one possibility to consider. And that's where stirring children's imagination about the past through fiction comes in. When they wonder how Pocahontas may have lived, may have felt about the events and people in her life, they begin to empathize. If you can empathize with someone from another time, you can empathize with your contemporaries in different lands. And the Great Spirit knows how much we need more empathy.

How to Avoid Actually Writing your Book

1. Do some "research". Doesn't matter on what.

2. Check your email. It might be important.

3. Check out what the historical fiction blogs are talking about today.

4. Fin yet another social networking or author site and laboriously fill everything out. It's marketing, you know.

5. Start your dozenth blog. Don't laugh. That's at least how many I have.

6. Take a nap. You aren't awake enough to do any writing anyway.

7. Check your web site and blog stats. Be thorough! You might learn something valuable in the minutiae.

8. Read someone else's book. Tell yourself the review you write will interest people in your own book.

9. Give in to your guilt about procrastinating your housework.

10. Join NaNoWriMo. That will take care of procratinating on your work in progress for thirty whole days!

How do you procrastinate writing?

A Whimsical Interview with Helen Hollick

Helen Hollick is the author of the Pendragon's Banner Trilogy, the latest of which is book two, Pendragon's Banner. You can read a review of the book today at That's All She Read and a full treatment next week on Historical Novel Review.

In honor of the Pendragon's Banner blog tour, Ms. Hollick was kind enough to time travel to late tenth century Enlgand to meet with Kerrick Trevalyan, a Cornish harper of about sixteen summers, who will star in his own novel by Nan Hawthorne sometime in the hopefully near future.

Kerrick Trevalyan: God give you peace, Mistress Hollick. Thank you for letting me assk some questions about your book, Pendragon's Banner. You know my name is Kerrick Trevalyan. My father is the bard Morcant Trevalyan. We are both from Cornwall, Right now I live in Wintanceaster with my teacher, O'Quill. It's 985 AD for me.

Helen Hollick: Good day to thee young Master Trevalyan.

KT: I said I am Cornish. So was Arthur, right?

HH: Well not necessarily. Several places lay claim to Arthur – from Brittany to Scotland. I think of him more in the Summer Land – Somerset and the West Country, so called because, as you may know, it is literally summer land: in winter the land floods, so only the high ground of the hills and the Tor at Yns Witrin (Glastonbury) are visible. Arthur (if he existed – that fact is not certain) was British, and in pre-Saxon times, before Britain became known as Engla-lond – England – all the Country below Hadrian’s Wall was known as Britain. When the Saxons settled and gradually became dominant only the “edges” remained “British” and retained the original language, which would have been similar to Welsh. (The word Wealas iss English for “foreigner”!) Of course Cornish and Breton is also similar to Welsh!

KT: I like the stories about Arthur. I can't decide which is my favorite. Which is yours?

HH: Well young Master Kerrick, I would assume you like the tales of knights and daring-do exploits eh? In my stories I do not have knights, or the Holy Grail, or the round table. There is no Merlin, no Lancelot or Galahad, for these were stories from a time much later than the “real” Arthur would have existed. I decided to use the old, early tales about him, that set Arthur in the years 450-550 AD, as a post-Roman war lord.

My favourite scenes are some of the arguments Arthur has with Gwenhwyfar (they were great fun to write!) and those that bring back memories of when I was researching them. Any scene on Yns Witrin (Glastonbury Tor) for instance. I so remember standing up there one evening listening to the wind as it whispered through the grass. I also like Chapter 34 (page 166) the opening of a battle scene. I wrote the scene in my head while standing at the edge of the river, imagining the mist and Arthur’s men appearing out of the dawn…

Chapter 28 – page 138, sapped a lot of emotion from me, as this is one of the rare scenes when Arthur reveals his true self – his loneliness and vulnerability. The scene where Arthur was fishing totally drained me though, I was shaking when I finished it. I had stood by the River Wye as the sun began to set, watching the golden reflections…. Saw a kingfisher, heard something else plop into the water. It had been raining and the river was swollen, in flood. My daughter was with me, she would have been about five years old. I held her hand so very, very tight! Read the scene and you will know why.

KT: I read your book, Pendragon's Banner. I have never read a whole book before. How long does it take to write a book? Is it hard?

HH: Yes writing novels – especially ones as long as mine is hard. It takes a lot of dedication and determination to keep going. It took me about ten years to write what eventually became The Kingmaking and Pendragon’s Banner! Though I’ve got a bit quicker now. My novel Harold the King took two years to research and write. (This is about the Battle of Hastings in 1066 – you keep clear of those Normans Boy, they are a thoroughly rough lot!)

The first in my Sea Witch Series (called Sea Witch) about Pirates only took about four months to write. But then these stories are adventure fantasy, and while there is a lot of history in them (and the nautical references took a while to research) I write them more as fun rather than historical fiction. The nice thing about them though – as I made the hero, Jesamiah Acorne up, he does not have to die in the last scene as happens in most historical novels! He gets to live and star in the next book of the series!

KT: One thing puzzles me. Why does Arthur have such trouble with the
women in his life? I mean, he never really trusts them. They are always trying to trick him. How come?

HH: I wanted to make him – and Gwenhwyfar – into real people, people who laughed and loved and cried. People who became frustrated and had to deal with tragedy and “life”. It was also fun to write some of the women as “baddies” ! I love Winifred and Morgause – they are so utterly nasty!

Also, Arthur is a complex character, I saw him as someone who was always coming up against Trouble. I think you’ll find that he does trust Gwenhwyfar though – despite the fact that he often squabbles with her. He loves her very deeply.

KT: How come there is no Merlin in your book? I once heard Emrys and Merlin were the same person, but it doesn't seem like it in your book.

HH: Merlin was never a real person, he was invented by the writers of the Medieval tales of Arthur – there is no mention of him in the early “Welsh” stories. Some people say Myrddin (Welsh for Merlin) could mean “wise man” and several stories make him out to be a Druid.

I think your reference to Emrys and Merlin comes from Mary Stewart’s wonderful novels The Hollow Hills and The Crystal Cave – it was those books that set me onto liking Arthur in the first place!

I decided not to use Merlin though, as I wanted to write a “what might have really happened” story – so I set out to not use any magic or fantasy.

[Spoiler] KT: It is so sad what happens to all of Arthur's and Gwenhyfar's sons. It seemed like he was lucky because he has so many sons, but it just gets sadder. Will they ever have another son?

HH: Ah – be careful not to give the plot away to readers who have not started the book yet! Yes, there is another son. He is Medraut – perhaps you know him as Mordred? He will appear in book three – Shadow of the King – along with Arthur’s daughter, Archfedd.

KT: I like how you have the Romans gone but Ambroasius and some others
still think they are Romans. Why do they like Rome more than Britain? Why does Arthur not agree with them?

HH: It is easy for us, where we are in Time, to look back and wonder why the people of the 5th century did not realise that the Romans were never coming back, but in 450 AD those who had supported Rome must have clung on to the hope that the Empire would sort itself out and things would get back to “normal”. Don’t forget Rome ruled most of Europe – and Britain – for over four hundred years. People only knew the ways of Rome, they had no idea of anything else.

There must have been a lot of conflict between the Roman people, such as Ambrosius, and men like Arthur who welcomed the chance of independence.

KT: I understood how the British people were worried about the Saxons.
Arthur never knew, but they really did take over. The king of England is now Ethelred II. The only British people left in their own land are the Cornish. But I worry that the Saxons will take that over too. What do you think we will lose if the Saxons take everything over?

HH: I think you will be all right – the Cornish are a tough lot, aren’t you! And of course there are the Welsh, they remain safe from the Saxons for a while (although Harold Godwineson – later King Harold, did conquer Wales) It wasn’t until those Nasty Normans came on the scene in the form of Edward I that things started getting bad for Wales and Scotland. So don’t worry about the Saxons… it’s the Normans you will have to tell your grandchildren to be wary of!

KT: My grandmother believed in the Lady and the old gods. But I do
not. I am a Christian. Why doesn't Arthur become a Christian?

HH: Many soldiers preferred to believe in the god Mithras. In the 5th Century Christianity was still a very new, very young religion and the old faiths were still merging with it – it is from this period that we get the traditions such as Christmas, which was a Roman/pagan celebration feast of mid winter and Saturnalia. I did not want to make Arthur Christian as I wanted to get away from the later Medieval Tales of him, so to make him pagan seemed a natural choice. I also quite liked the few scenes where I blended Christianity with the Old Religion – the broach given to Arthur, for instance. The priest took the woman painted on it as the Madonna – Arthur thought she was the Lady.

KT: Is there really magic? My grandmother says there is, but I don't
want to believe her. Arthur doesn't even believe in God. Did he believe in magic?

HH: I suppose it depends on what you believe to be magic? I think to see a golden sunset, the stars in the sky, a new-born creature – animal or human – is surely magic? In modern times, science explains many things that people thought were magic, as does knowing the signs of nature. When Morgainne saw the birds rising from the lake she knew someone was coming. Or maybe she knew by magic?

KT: Do you like harp music? I play the harp. Shall I sing you a song about Arthur?

HH: Yes I like harp music. Thank you, I would enjoy listening to a song very much!

KT: I want to read your first book about Arthur. What is it called?
Where can I get it? When is the third book coming out? Is that all you ever get to do, write books? You must spend all your time writing.

HH: The first book is The Kingmaking – Arthur is a young boy, a little younger than you, at the start. Book three, Shadow of the King is due for publication in March 2010 – although it is available in a different edition from the UK if anyone can’t wait!

I spend most of my time writing, yes, or promoting them on the magic machine that is called a computer! At the moment I am working on the fourth book in my adventure fantasy pirate-based Sea Witch Series.

KT: How did you decide which stories about Arthur you would keep in
your book and which you would throw out?

HH: I used most of the early Welsh tales – none of the later Medieval ones. For the rest, I had to decide what fitted and what did not – that is the art of writing.

KT: Have you ever met a king? My master, O'Quill, has. He met Ethelred and also the High King of Tara. That is pretty exciting, isn't it?

HH: I haven’t actually met a King – or a Queen, but I have seen Queen Elizabeth II quite close up. She’s quite small in real life – not much taller than 5’ and is a very, very nice lady,. She has a lovely smile.

Incidentally another of my novels – A Hollow Crown – is about Aethelred’s Norman wife, Emma. She was married to him in the year 1002, and was to give him a son, Edward, who was later called the Confessor.

KT: 1002? That is really soon... and he has a different wife now! I better not tell anyone.

HH: Thank you for talking to me Master Kerrick, I have enjoyed meeting you.

KT: (Giggles, then blushess because he giggled.) It was really interesting. I don't know if we can get your book in the tenth century, but I will try to find out. (Whispers) I will sing you a song now, but can I ask a question? What is a "knight"?

Thanks for being such a good spot, Helen! Nan

Anglo Saxon Friendship Bracelet, from ShowMe

Reprinted without permission from ShowMe, a UK kids' educational site. Please visit the site for full illustrations.

Anglo-Saxons were really good at weaving and embroidery. Many beautiful examples of material, clothes and belts have been found. One of the ways they used to decorate their clothes was by plaiting or braiding coloured thread.

Their jewellery and other metalwork was often decorated with patterns that looked like braids or plaits too.

Braiding is really easy to do. It's fun, and with a little practice you can get really beautiful results. Your friends will love getting presents that you've made yourself.

You will need:

Silk embroidery thread, wool or leather cord
Scissors
Sticky tape

The very easiest plait is one with three threads, but you're all too clever for that so here's how to plait with five.

Start off by cutting five lengths of your thread. Try to make them all about the same length.

Take one end of each piece of thread and tie them together with a simple knot.

Now tape the knotted end of your threads to a tabletop or any clear, steady surface where you can do your plaiting.

Lay the threads out flat in front of you, like in our picture.

Start with one of the outer threads, it doesn't matter which side.

Cross it over the two threads next to it and into the middle.

Now do the same with the outer thread from the other side.

That's all you do! Keep going, always crossing the outer threads over into the middle and remembering to swap sides each time. Remember as well to tighten the plait each time you cross over - pushing the plaited section gently up to the last plait each time.

Try to keep the plait smooth and even as you go.

There you go, easy isn't it? When your plait is long enough, or you get to the end of the threads, tie a knot again to keep the plait in place.

Untape the plait and tie the two ends together to make your bracelet.

You'll find that the more you plait, the easier it gets.

It's fun to experiment with different colours and different numbers of threads. Beads look pretty threaded on to bracelets as well.

As you plait, spare a thought for those Anglo-Saxons, plaiting just like you (apart from the sticky tape of course) hundreds of years ago. Do you think they made bracelets for their friends too?